King v. Seagrave

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

King v. Seagrave

264 A.D.2d 468, 693 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8830

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D.2d 468 (King v. Seagrave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Seagrave, 264 A.D.2d 468, 693 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8830 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Michael F. Se agrave appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered August 17, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as° asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant failed to establish his entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Michael F. Se agrave appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered August 17, 1998, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as° asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court properly determined that the appellant failed to establish his entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him (see, CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D.2d 468, 693 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-seagrave-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack