King v. Rodgers
100 S.E. 229, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 490
This text of 100 S.E. 229 (King v. Rodgers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. Rodgers, 100 S.E. 229, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 490 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
1. The court did not err in overruling the exceptions of law to the auditor’s report.
2. The court erred in directing a verdict against the defendant upon the 1st, 2d, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th exceptions of facts to the auditor’s report, and in thereafter refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 229, 24 Ga. App. 188, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-rodgers-gactapp-1919.