King v. Rochester Products

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

King v. Rochester Products

64 A.D.2d 737, 406 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12576

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 737 (King v. Rochester Products) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Rochester Products, 64 A.D.2d 737, 406 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 10, 1977, which disallowed medical benefits on a finding that there was no injury arising out of and in the course of employment. Claimant, as well as many other fellow workers of the employer, was referred by his union to a doctor for an ear examination. No hearing loss was found and the employer refused to pay the bills, which in total amounted to $4,493.88. The bill in the instant case was $41.90 and the referee directed the employer to pay it. The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed and found that the medical bills were not properly chargeable to the employer. We agree (Matter of Marro v Cook, 22 AD2d 730). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 10, 1977, which disallowed medical benefits on a finding that there was no injury arising out of and in the course of employment. Claimant, as well as many other fellow workers of the employer, was referred by his union to a doctor for an ear examination. No hearing loss was found and the employer refused to pay the bills, which in total amounted to $4,493.88. The bill in the instant case was $41.90 and the referee directed the employer to pay it. The Workers’ Compensation Board reversed and found that the medical bills were not properly chargeable to the employer. We agree (Matter of Marro v Cook, 22 AD2d 730). Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 737, 406 N.Y.S.2d 606, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-rochester-products-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack