King v. Riverwatch Condominium Owner's Ass'n

167 A.3d 700, 2017 WL 772826, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 498
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. Riverwatch Condominium Owner's Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 638 Pa. 336
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 28, 2017·No. King, D. v. Riverwatch Condo Owner's Assn - No. 739 MAL 2016·Published

Opinion

*701 ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

The Application for Relief Pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 123, filed by Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See King v. Delaware County Court of Common Pleas Judge, 2 MM 2017 (order dated February 28, 2017) (issuing a rule on Petitioners “to show cause why they should not be barred from submitting any further filings in this Court relative to the civil action involving Riverwatch Condominium Owners Association, including any related orders concerning the awards of costs, as well as directives barring Thomas P. Gan-non, Esquire, from representing Daniel King.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Riverwatch Condominium Owner's Ass'n, 167 A.3d 700, 2017 WL 772826, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 498 (Pa. 2017).

167 A.3d 700 (King v. Riverwatch Condominium Owner's Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.