King v. Preterm, Inc.

Supreme Court

King v. Preterm, Inc.

448 U.S. 901, 100 S. Ct. 3039

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 30, 1980

DocketNo. 79-1027

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 448 U.S. 901 (King v. Preterm, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Preterm, Inc., 448 U.S. 901, 100 S. Ct. 3039 (1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from C. A. 1st Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mr. Justice Rehnquist, being of the view that the order of the Court of Appeals “amending its mandate” to embrace the invalidation of an entirely separate statute is not governed by FTC v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Co., 344 U. S. 206 (1952), dissents from dismissal of the appeal and would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from C. A. 1st Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Mr. Justice Rehnquist, being of the view that the order of the Court of Appeals “amending its mandate” to embrace the invalidation of an entirely separate statute is not governed by FTC v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Co., 344 U. S. 206 (1952), dissents from dismissal of the appeal and would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 U.S. 901, 100 S. Ct. 3039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-preterm-inc-scotus-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack