King v. Power Authority

343 N.E.2d 767, 38 N.Y.2d 756, 381 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2365
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 2, 1975·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order appealed from should be affirmed, essentially for the reasons contained in the opinion by Mr. Justice Ellis J. Staley, Jr., writing for the unanimous Appellate Division, Third Department.

As that opinion indicates, defendants have assured plaintiffs [758]*758that they will be compensated for the damages caused to their property. Accordingly, we leave for another day the question of whether the Power Authority may be enjoined from making a temporary entry upon land where the damages are more substantial. Nor do we find any need in this case to determine when such an entry is invasive enough to constitute a taking for public use within the meaning of section 6 of article I of the New York State Constitution.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Power Authority, 343 N.E.2d 767, 38 N.Y.2d 756, 381 N.Y.S.2d 50, 1975 N.Y. LEXIS 2365 (N.Y. 1975).

343 N.E.2d 767 (King v. Power Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blades v. New York State Low-Level Radioactive Waste Siting Commission
145 Misc. 2d 1040 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
King v. POWER AUTH. OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
343 N.E.2d 767 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)