King v. Powell.

37 S.E. 62, 127 N.C. 10, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 4
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 9, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 62 (King v. Powell.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Powell., 37 S.E. 62, 127 N.C. 10, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 4 (N.C. 1900).

Opinion

Faircloth, C. J.

The plaintiff had a docketed judgment against W. W. Powell, who conveyed his tract of land to A. M. Powell and John Powell after said judgment was docketed. The plaintiff institutes this action for an order to sell said land to satisfy said judgment. The defendants demur to the complaint on the ground that it appears therein that the plaintiff’s lien had expired and was lost by the lapse of time. The demurrer was sustained, his Honor bolding that the complaint stated no cause of action against the defendants. The plaintiff excepted, and appealed.

*11 We express no opinion on tbe point decided by bis Honor, for tbe reason tbat tbe statute of limitations can not be set up by demurrer. Bacon v. Berry, 85 N. C., 124. Tbe objection tbat tbe action was not commenced witbin tbe time limited can only be taken by answer. Code, sec. 138; Green v. Railroad Co., 73 N. C., 524; Kahnweiler v. Anderson, 78 N. C., 133; Bank v. Loughran, 122 .N C., 668. The Code requires tbe statute of limitations to be specially pleaded, whether tbe cause of action be legal or equitable. Guthrie v. Bacon, 107 N. C., 337.

Error. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Iredell County v. Crawford
138 S.E.2d 539 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Lewis v. Shaver
73 S.E.2d 320 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 62, 127 N.C. 10, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-powell-nc-1900.