King v. Pelkofski

New York Court of Appeals

King v. Pelkofski

219 N.E.2d 884, 18 N.Y.2d 688, 273 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1253

DecidedJuly 7, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 219 N.E.2d 884 (King v. Pelkofski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Pelkofski, 219 N.E.2d 884, 18 N.Y.2d 688, 273 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1253 (N.Y. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution because it directs a remission to the Trial Term to ascertain the total of various items which gives plaintiff a lien upon the real estate. Appeals may be taken directly to this court from the determination hereafter to be made by the Trial Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution because it directs a remission to the Trial Term to ascertain the total of various items which gives plaintiff a lien upon the real estate. Appeals may be taken directly to this court from the determination hereafter to be made by the Trial Term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 N.E.2d 884, 18 N.Y.2d 688, 273 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-pelkofski-ny-1966.