King v. Pelkofski

219 N.E.2d 884, 18 N.Y.2d 688, 273 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1253
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. Pelkofski. Read the opinion of the Court — 20 N.Y.2d 326
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 7, 1966·Published

Opinion

Appeals dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution because it directs a remission to the Trial Term to ascertain the total of various items which gives plaintiff a lien upon the real estate. Appeals may be taken directly to this court from the determination hereafter to be made by the Trial Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Pelkofski, 219 N.E.2d 884, 18 N.Y.2d 688, 273 N.Y.S.2d 438, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1253 (N.Y. 1966).

219 N.E.2d 884 (King v. Pelkofski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.