King v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

King v. Palmer

162 P. 821, 62 Okla. 299, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 964

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 19, 1916

Docket7711

StatusPublished

This text of 162 P. 821 (King v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Palmer, 162 P. 821, 62 Okla. 299, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 964 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

Where the plaintiffs in error have briefed their cause, and the defendants in error have filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for a failure so to do, and the extension of time allowed them in which to file brief has expired, and the brief of plaintiffs in error indicates that there are errors in the record, and the authorities therein cited seem to support their contention, the cause will be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is.so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

Where the plaintiffs in error have briefed their cause, and the defendants in error have filed no brief, nor offered any excuse for a failure so to do, and the extension of time allowed them in which to file brief has expired, and the brief of plaintiffs in error indicates that there are errors in the record, and the authorities therein cited seem to support their contention, the cause will be reversed and remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is.so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 P. 821, 62 Okla. 299, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-palmer-okla-1916.