King v. Oregon Short Line R.
This text of 165 P. 349 (King v. Oregon Short Line R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff calls attention to the absence of assignments of error in the abstract on appeal. Under the authority of Salene v. Isherwood, 74 Or. 35, 39 (144 Pac. 1175), and Dundas v. Grand View Land Co., 79 Or. 379, 380 (155 Pac. 365), this condition of the record precludes the consideration of the questions discussed in appellant’s brief. We find that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 P. 349, 84 Or. 429, 1917 Ore. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-oregon-short-line-r-or-1917.