King v. Office of Personnel Management

Federal Circuit

King v. Office of Personnel Management

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. Office of Personnel Management. Read the opinion of the Court — 730 F.3d 1342 →

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 30, 2012·No. 2012-3061·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit KATHRYN KING, Petiti0ner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respon,dent, AND DIANA M. KING, In.tervenor. * 2012-3061 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DE831M090077-B-1. ON MOTION ORDER Diana M. King moves without opposition for leave to intervene out of time. King was a named party below Pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federa1 Rules of Appel1ate Procedure, King may seek

KING V. OPM 2 intervention in this court. This court also has authority to accept an untimely motion to intervene See generally Kru,pp Intern, In,c. v. U.S. Int’l Tro:de C0mm'n, 644 F.2d 869 (C.C.P.A. 1981). Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDER1-in THAT: The motion for leave to intervene is granted The re- vised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT APR 39 2913 /S/ Jan H0rba1y Date J an HorbaIy Clerk - oc: Matthew J. Dowd, Esq. Nicho1as Jabbour, Esq. FlLED - - . .CDUFlT APPEALS FUB D1aI13 M- K1n€ U sms FEn'?§».L macon 824 APR 30 2012 .\ANHnnBALY cLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit KATHRYN KING, Petiti0ner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respon,dent, AND DIANA M. KING, In.tervenor. * 2012-3061 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. DE831M090077-B-1. ON MOTION ORDER Diana M. King moves without opposition for leave to intervene out of time. King was a named party below Pursuant to Rule 15(d) of the Federa1 Rules of Appel1ate Procedure, King may seek

KING V. OPM 2 intervention in this court. This court also has authority to accept an untimely motion to intervene See generally Kru,pp Intern, In,c. v. U.S. Int’l Tro:de C0mm'n, 644 F.2d 869 (C.C.P.A. 1981). Upon consideration thereof IT ls 0RDER1-in THAT: The motion for leave to intervene is granted The re- vised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT APR 39 2913 /S/ Jan H0rba1y Date J an HorbaIy Clerk - oc: Matthew J. Dowd, Esq. Nicho1as Jabbour, Esq. FlLED - - . .CDUFlT APPEALS FUB D1aI13 M- K1n€ U sms FEn'?§».L macon 824 APR 30 2012 .\ANHnnBALY cLERK

King v. Office of Personnel Management, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

King v. Office of Personnel Management (King v. Office of Personnel Management) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related