King v. Oakland County Prosecutor
784 N.W.2d 43, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1451, 2010 WL 2783903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. Oakland County Prosecutor. Read the opinion of the Court — 488 Mich. 858 →
Opinion
Barry L. KING, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we DIRECT the trial court to provide reasons for denying the motion to consolidate. The motion for stay is DENIED.
We retain jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Oakland County Prosecutor, 784 N.W.2d 43, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1451, 2010 WL 2783903 (Mich. 2010).
784 N.W.2d 43 (King v. Oakland County Prosecutor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.