King v. Oakland County Prosecutor

784 N.W.2d 43, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1451, 2010 WL 2783903
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. Oakland County Prosecutor. Read the opinion of the Court — 488 Mich. 858
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided July 14, 2010·No. 141405·Published

Opinion

784 N.W.2d 43 (2010)

Barry L. KING, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
OAKLAND COUNTY PROSECUTOR, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket Nos. 141405. COA No. 298947.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 14, 2010.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we DIRECT the trial court to provide reasons for denying the motion to consolidate. The motion for stay is DENIED.

We retain jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Oakland County Prosecutor, 784 N.W.2d 43, 2010 Mich. LEXIS 1451, 2010 WL 2783903 (Mich. 2010).

784 N.W.2d 43 (King v. Oakland County Prosecutor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.