King v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

85 A.D.3d 631, 925 N.Y.S.2d 820

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia S. Kern, J.), entered on or about May 3, 2010, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs failure to cite “any law, rule, regulation or declaratory ruling adopted pursuant to law” (Labor Law § 741 [1] [d]), which she, “in good faith, reasonably believe[d]” (Labor Law § 741 [2] [a]) to have been violated, is fatal to her cause of action alleging retaliation (see Deshpande v Medisys Health Network, Inc., 70 AD3d 760, 762 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 713 [2010]; see also Pipia v Nassau County, 34 AD3d 664, 666 [2006]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Tom, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 85 A.D.3d 631, 925 N.Y.S.2d 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

85 A.D.3d 631 (King v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pipia v. Nassau County
34 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Deshpande v. Medisys Health Network, Inc.
70 A.D.3d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)