King v. Neill

126 S.E. 896, 33 Ga. App. 552, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 587
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1925·No. 16065·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A petition by which the owner oí lands seeks to recover damages' for alleged libelous or slanderous words falsely impugning his title, but which fails to allege that the words were malicious, sets forth no cause of action. Civil Code (1910), § 4479; Schoen v. Maryland Casualty Co., 47 Ga. 151, 153 (93 S. E. 82).

2. Under the above-stated ruling the petition in the instant case did not set out a cause of action, and the court properly dismissed it on demurrer.

Judgment affh'med.

Broyles, C. J., and Blood/worth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Neill, 126 S.E. 896, 33 Ga. App. 552, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 587 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

126 S.E. 896 (King v. Neill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Taggart v. Savannah Gas Co.
175 S.E. 491 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934)