King v. Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

King v. Moore

133 S.E.2d 449, 260 N.C. 680, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 776

DecidedDecember 11, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 133 S.E.2d 449 (King v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Moore, 133 S.E.2d 449, 260 N.C. 680, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 776 (N.C. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER Cueiam.

The jury, under .application of well-settled principles of law, resolved the first two issues of fact in plaintiff’s favor, and the third issue oif fact against her. A careful examination of the assignments of error in respect to the admission of evidence and in respect to the charge, particularly as to the third issue, discloses no new questions or feature requiring extended discussion. Prejudicial error hats not been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Cueiam.

The jury, under .application of well-settled principles of law, resolved the first two issues of fact in plaintiff’s favor, and the third issue oif fact against her. A careful examination of the assignments of error in respect to the admission of evidence and in respect to the charge, particularly as to the third issue, discloses no new questions or feature requiring extended discussion. Prejudicial error hats not been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 S.E.2d 449, 260 N.C. 680, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-moore-nc-1963.