King v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. Moore

842 So. 2d 852, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18691, 2002 WL 31840854

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 2002·No. No. 2D01-1073·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert King challenges the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus specifically seeking review of a final order of the circuit court acting in its review capacity. For the purpose of this court’s review, King’s appeal has been converted to a petition for writ of certiorari. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998). Because the circuit court afforded King due process and complied with the essential requirements of law, we deny his petition for writ of certiorari. See White [853]*853v. Moore, 789 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Denied.

CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and KELLY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert King challenges the denial of his petition for writ of mandamus specifically seeking review of a final order of the circuit court acting in its review capacity. For the purpose of this court’s review, King’s appeal has been converted to a petition for writ of certiorari. See Sheley v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998). Because the circuit court afforded King due process and complied with the essential requirements of law, we deny his petition for writ of certiorari. See White [853]*853v. Moore, 789 So.2d 1118 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

Denied.

CASANUEVA, SALCINES, and KELLY, JJ., concur.

King v. Moore, 842 So. 2d 852, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 18691, 2002 WL 31840854 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

842 So. 2d 852 (King v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related