Home/Ohio Supreme Court/King v. Melia

King v. Melia

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 24, 1903
DocketNo. 7648
StatusPublished

This text of 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680 (King v. Melia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Melia, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680 (Ohio 1903).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear and Price, JJ., concur on the ground that there is no error in the judgment below, and all concur in the judgment of affirmance on the ground that there is no compliance with that part of Section 6711, Revised Statutes, which requires so much of the record to be reviewed as will show the error complained of, to be printed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-melia-ohio-1903.