Home/Ohio Supreme Court/King v. Melia

King v. Melia

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 24, 1903·No. No. 7648·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

Burket, C. J., Spear and Price, JJ., concur on the ground that there is no error in the judgment below, and all concur in the judgment of affirmance on the ground that there is no compliance with that part of Section 6711, Revised Statutes, which requires so much of the record to be reviewed as will show the error complained of, to be printed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Melia, 68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680 (Ohio 1903).

68 Ohio St. (N.S.) 680 (King v. Melia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.