King v. M'Daniel

8 Va. 451

Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided April 15, 1799·Published

Opinion

Pendleton, President.

May not tort be a sufficient ground whereon to found assumpsit f

By the appellant’s counsel. The court did not appear to admit it in Winston v. Francisco, 2 Wash. 187.

Lyons, Judge. That case was decided upon the want of an averment of a promise.

Carrington, Judge. Winston v. Francisco was determined expressly upon the ground that no assumpsit was alledged.

Per Cur. Affirm the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pendleton, President.

May not tort be a sufficient ground whereon to found assumpsit f

By the appellant’s counsel. The court did not appear to admit it in Winston v. Francisco, 2 Wash. 187.

Lyons, Judge. That case was decided upon the want of an averment of a promise.

Carrington, Judge. Winston v. Francisco was determined expressly upon the ground that no assumpsit was alledged.

Per Cur. Affirm the judgment.

King v. M'Daniel, 8 Va. 451 (Va. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

8 Va. 451 (King v. M'Daniel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.