King v. McGhee
This text of 25 S.E. 849 (King v. McGhee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sureties upon a promissory note, whether they sign' the same upon the face or upon the back thereof, are entitled, upon paying the note, to maintain an action thereon against their principal; and a declaration filed by them Wherein they sue upon the note as the owners of the same, may be amended by setting forth the facts as they exist, and stating their true relation to the contract evidenced by the paper declared upon, (a) For the distinction between indorsers and sureties by indorsement, see Sibley et al. v. American Exch. Nat. Bank, 97 Ga. 126, 25 S. E. Rep. 470. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 S.E. 849, 99 Ga. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-mcghee-ga-1896.