King v. McClintock

Fourth Circuit

King v. McClintock

78 F. 925, 24 C.C.A. 684, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 2, 1897

DocketNo. 184

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 78 F. 925 (King v. McClintock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. McClintock, 78 F. 925, 24 C.C.A. 684, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726 (4th Cir. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case presents precisely the same facts and the same questions as that of King v. Buskirk (just decided) 78 Fed. 233. The appellant is the same person as the appellant in that case, and the appellees were defendants in the injunction suits as well as in 1he action at law. The verdict of the jury was in their favor, and their motion to dissolve the injunction was based on that verdict. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case presents precisely the same facts and the same questions as that of King v. Buskirk (just decided) 78 Fed. 233. The appellant is the same person as the appellant in that case, and the appellees were defendants in the injunction suits as well as in 1he action at law. The verdict of the jury was in their favor, and their motion to dissolve the injunction was based on that verdict. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

78 F. 925, 24 C.C.A. 684, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-mcclintock-ca4-1897.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack