King v. McClintock

Fourth Circuit

King v. McClintock

78 F. 925, 24 C.C.A. 684, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 1897·No. No. 184·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case presents precisely the same facts and the same questions as that of King v. Buskirk (just decided) 78 Fed. 233. The appellant is the same person as the appellant in that case, and the appellees were defendants in the injunction suits as well as in 1he action at law. The verdict of the jury was in their favor, and their motion to dissolve the injunction was based on that verdict. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

This case presents precisely the same facts and the same questions as that of King v. Buskirk (just decided) 78 Fed. 233. The appellant is the same person as the appellant in that case, and the appellees were defendants in the injunction suits as well as in 1he action at law. The verdict of the jury was in their favor, and their motion to dissolve the injunction was based on that verdict. The decree of the circuit court is affirmed.

King v. McClintock, 78 F. 925, 24 C.C.A. 684, 1897 U.S. App. LEXIS 1726 (4th Cir. 1897).

Pincite

78 F. 925 (King v. McClintock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related