King v. McCann

25 Ala. 471
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 25 Ala. 471 (King v. McCann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. McCann, 25 Ala. 471 (Ala. 1854).

Opinion

CHILTON, C. J. —

Motion is made to strike this cause from the docket, because no bond was given for the appeal, nor security for cost. The clerk in his certificate says, “ no-bond was required because all costs have been paid.”

The statute says, “No appeal shall be taken without giving bond to supersede the execution of the judgment or decree, unless the appellant give security for the costs of such appeal, to be approved by the clerk, register, or judge of probate ; the names of such securities to be certified with the record,” &c. This security is not for the costs which have accrued, as the clerk seems to have supposed, but for “the cost of the appeal.” The statute is peremptory, that no appeal shall be taken without this -security ; and as there is no security in this case, there can be no valid appeal. — Code, § 3041.

Let the case be stricken from the docket.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Singleton v. Perkins
246 So. 2d 429 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)
Gray v. State Ex Rel. Attorney General
185 So. 2d 125 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1965)
Harris v. Barber
186 So. 160 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
Colbert County v. Tennessee Valley Bank
144 So. 803 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Griswold v. Thornton
129 Ala. 454 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1900)
Ten Brook v. Maxwell
32 N.E. 106 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Ala. 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-mccann-ala-1854.