King v. Mayhood

101 P. 1133, 80 Kan. 81, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 16
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedApril 10, 1909
DocketNo. 15,893
StatusPublished

This text of 101 P. 1133 (King v. Mayhood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Mayhood, 101 P. 1133, 80 Kan. 81, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 16 (kan 1909).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This is a proceeding in error from an order awarding a mandamus against the mayor and council of Atchison requiring them to make provision for the payment of a judgment against the city. The objections urged to the proceedings are purely technical. No substantial reason is shown why such provision ought not to have been made sooner, or why it should not now be required, or why the damages allowed should be disturbed. The order of the trial ‘court is affirmed, but as some of the dates named therein for action to be taken have now passed the cause will be remanded that such changes may be made as to render it effective.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 P. 1133, 80 Kan. 81, 1909 Kan. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-mayhood-kan-1909.