King v. Mason

99 So. 2d 117, 234 La. 299, 1958 La. LEXIS 1099
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 6, 1958
Docket43578
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 99 So. 2d 117 (King v. Mason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Mason, 99 So. 2d 117, 234 La. 299, 1958 La. LEXIS 1099 (La. 1958).

Opinion

SIMON, Justice.

On application of the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company we granted writs in this case addressed to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, and ordered same consolidated for hearing with Kendrick v. Mason, 234 La. 271, 99 So.2d 108.

Harvey A. King instituted this suit for damages for personal injuries sustained by him as the result of the negligent acts and tort committed by C. N. Mason and his employees in their performance of the contract with the Town of Jena as more fully detailed in the said Kendrick suit. Judgment was rendered in favor of King and against C. N. Mason and his insurer, in solido, by the district court, which, on appeal to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, was amended so as to increase the award for personal damages in favor of the said plaintiff, and as amended the judgment of the district court was affirmed.

The issues herein presented are identical with those considered by us in Kendrick v. Mason, 234 La. 271, 99 So.2d 108, both cases having grown out of the same tort and consolidated here for purposes of hearing before us.

*301 Relative to the-issue of the quantum of damages for personal injuries awarded by the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, in favor of plaintiff, we observe that no error is assigned thereto by the defendants herein. However, we have examined the evidence relative to the personal injuries sustained by plaintiff and find no manifest error in the adequacy of the award made therefor.

Accordingly, for the reasons assigned in Kendrick v. Mason, supra, the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Church of Christ Scientist v. City of Seattle
964 P.2d 374 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1998)
Oceanonics, Inc. v. Petroleum Distributing Company
280 So. 2d 874 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1973)
Sylvest v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.
252 So. 2d 693 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1971)
JM Brown Const. Co. v. D & M Mechanical Contr., Inc.
222 So. 2d 93 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
Insurance Co. of North America v. Electronic Purification Co.
433 P.2d 174 (California Supreme Court, 1967)
LaBove v. American Employers Insurance Company
189 So. 2d 315 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)
Tillery v. Pelican Ice & Cold Storage, Inc.
184 So. 2d 65 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1966)
Neumann v. Wisconsin Natural Gas Co.
134 N.W.2d 474 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1965)
Taylor Con. & Sup. Co. v. American Mut. Liabil. Ins. Co.
163 So. 2d 450 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
De Shazo v. Cantrelle
165 So. 2d 893 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1964)
Miller v. Riley
152 So. 2d 852 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1963)
Nielson v. Travelers Indemnity Company
174 F. Supp. 648 (N.D. Iowa, 1959)
Kendrick v. Mason
99 So. 2d 108 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 So. 2d 117, 234 La. 299, 1958 La. LEXIS 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-mason-la-1958.