King v. Machesney
80 Ill. App. 240, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 405
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. Machesney. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 Ill. App. 341 →
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
In this case there is no assignment of errors written upon or attached to the record. The judgment of the Superior Court must, therefore, be affirmed.
See opinion of this court in I. Rosin v. William Wilde, 80 Ill. App. 58, where authorities are cited. Affirmed. Opinion filed February 14, 1899.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Machesney, 80 Ill. App. 240, 1898 Ill. App. LEXIS 405 (Ill. Ct. App. 1899).
80 Ill. App. 240 (King v. Machesney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosin v. Wilde
80 Ill. App. 58 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)