King v. Lyman

Connecticut Superior Court

King v. Lyman

1 Root 104

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1785

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Root 104 (King v. Lyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Lyman, 1 Root 104 (Colo. Ct. App. 1785).

Pincite

Opinion

And

by the Court.

Tbe evidence is irrelevant, for no intermeddling with tbe real estate of tbe deceased will make the defendant an executor de son tort. Nor will bis bolding and disposing of goods and chattels, conveyed by tbe deceased in bis lifetime; although tbe bill of sale of them was fraudulent; for though tbe bill of sale may be fraudulent as to creditors, it is good and valid between tbe parties, and upon these principles all evidence of this kind was excluded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

And

by the Court.

Tbe evidence is irrelevant, for no intermeddling with tbe real estate of tbe deceased will make the defendant an executor de son tort. Nor will bis bolding and disposing of goods and chattels, conveyed by tbe deceased in bis lifetime; although tbe bill of sale of them was fraudulent; for though tbe bill of sale may be fraudulent as to creditors, it is good and valid between tbe parties, and upon these principles all evidence of this kind was excluded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-lyman-connsuperct-1785.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack