King v. Liebeskind
26 Jones & S. 580
This text of 26 Jones & S. 580 (King v. Liebeskind) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. Liebeskind, 26 Jones & S. 580 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).
Opinion
The pleadings were not before the general term. For that reason the Court (Per Curiam) held there was nothing to show that the court below erred, and affirmed the order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
26 Jones & S. 580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-liebeskind-nysuperctnyc-1890.