King v. Lee County

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided April 16, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-00375·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

TAMMY KING,

Plaintiff, Case No. 2:24-CV-375-JLB-KCD

v.

SHERIFF CARMINE MARCENO, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS LEE COUNTY SHERIFF; DEPUTY JAY BRETT, INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; DEPUTY JASON WARD, INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; DEPUTY JOHNATHON ARMATO, INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; DEPUTY MELQUIAS OLIVO, INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY; MILLENIUM PHYSICIAN GROUP, LLC, FRANCISCO MARASIGAN, KRISTIN GUSTIN,

Defendants, /

ORDER The parties move to stay all discovery until the pending motions to dismiss are resolved. (Doc. 68.) Alternatively, they seek “an extension of all deadlines, to include the deadlines for disclosure of the expert witnesses, by 120 days.” (Id. at 5.) Staying discovery pending a motion to dismiss is the exception, not the rule. This is because suspending discovery indefinitely “tend[s] to delay resolution of cases.” Fetchick v. Eslinger, No. 6:15-CV-96- ORL-28TBS, 2016 WL 8929252, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 11, 2016); see also Middle District of Florida, Civil Discovery Handbook, E. Timeliness and Sanctions. In assessing whether to stay discovery until a motion is decided, the court “must balance the harm produced by a delay in discovery against the possibility that the motion will be granted and entirely eliminate the need for such discovery.” Feldman v. Flood, 176 F.R.D. 651, 652 (M.D. Fla. 1997). The Court declines to stay discovery here. Although Defendants have raised several defenses that could limit this case, their motions will not entirely resolve it. And in any event, the procedural problems created by staying this case indefinitely outweighs the benefits. See Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706 (1997) (explaining that district courts have broad discretion to stay proceedings “as an incident to its power to control [their] own docket’). The Court will, however, grant the parties’ alternative relief and extend the

case management deadlines so the motions to dismiss can be decided before encroaching on the discovery period. A new case management order will follow. ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on April 16, 2025.

Af fn pe Le aL. si all * Kale C. Dudek United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Lee County, (M.D. Fla. 2025).

King v. Lee County (King v. Lee County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clinton v. Jones
520 U.S. 681 (Supreme Court, 1997)
Feldman v. Flood
176 F.R.D. 651 (M.D. Florida, 1997)