King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter

110 F. App'x 332
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2004·No. No. 03-1138·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James King, Linda King, and Wendy King appeal the district court’s order dismissing sua sponte their civil complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter, No. CA-02-2164-AMD (D.Md. Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter, 110 F. App'x 332 (4th Cir. 2004).

110 F. App'x 332 (King v. Law Firm of Goldman & Vetter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)