King v. LAROSE
963 A.2d 113
This text of 963 A.2d 113 (King v. LAROSE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. LAROSE, 963 A.2d 113 (Colo. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
James KING
v.
Elisha LAROSE et al.
Appellate Court of Connecticut.
HARPER, LAVINE and PELLEGRINO, Js.
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff's appeal from the Superior Court in the judicial district of New Haven, Thompson, J.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
963 A.2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-larose-connappct-2009.