King v. King

375 U.S. 17, 11 L. Ed. 2d 45, 84 S. Ct. 101, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 525
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 14, 1963·No. No. 153·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion ‘to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. King, 375 U.S. 17, 11 L. Ed. 2d 45, 84 S. Ct. 101, 1963 U.S. LEXIS 525 (1963).

375 U.S. 17 (King v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bobbie L. Bishop
534 F.2d 214 (Tenth Circuit, 1976)
Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
Frank Houser and Winnie Houser v. United States
508 F.2d 509 (Eighth Circuit, 1974)
United States v. George Ray Steinkoenig
487 F.2d 225 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)
Eby v. United States
286 F. Supp. 387 (N.D. Oklahoma, 1968)
United States v. Gayle Randal Farrington
389 F.2d 357 (Sixth Circuit, 1968)
United States v. Harry E. Rohalla
369 F.2d 220 (Seventh Circuit, 1966)
United States ex rel. Jenkins v. Follette
257 F. Supp. 533 (S.D. New York, 1965)
Robert Henry Landsdown v. United States
348 F.2d 405 (Fifth Circuit, 1965)
LaClair v. United States
241 F. Supp. 819 (N.D. Indiana, 1965)
William Caldwell v. United States
338 F.2d 385 (Eighth Circuit, 1964)