King v. King

216 A.D.2d 962, 629 N.Y.S.2d 158
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 9, 1995·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order of Family Court that set aside a custodial arrangement, established by agreement of the parties and incorporated in a court order. He contends that such arrangement "should be changed based only upon ' "countervailing circumstances on consideration of the totality of circumstances” ’ ” (Fox v Fox, 177 AD2d 209, 210-211, quoting [963] Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 95; see, Matter of Aylesworth v Aylesworth, 207 AD2d 970). Although a preexisting custodial arrangement should be accorded great weight, Family Court was "in the most advantageous position to evaluate the testimony, character, and sincerity of the parties” (DeJesus v DeJesus, 208 AD2d 587, 588, citing Eschbach v Eschbach, 56 NY2d 167), and the court’s determination should not be disturbed where, as here, it has a sound and substantial basis in the record (see, Matter of Gloria S. v Richard B., 80 AD2d 72, 76). (Appeal from Order of Oswego County Family Court, Auser, J.H.O.—Custody.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Pine, Callahan and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. King, 216 A.D.2d 962, 629 N.Y.S.2d 158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

216 A.D.2d 962 (King v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. King
15 A.D.3d 999 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Schimmel v. Schimmel
262 A.D.2d 990 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)