King v. King
10 A.D.2d 834, 200 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 A.D.2d 437 →
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. King, 10 A.D.2d 834, 200 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).
10 A.D.2d 834 (King v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.