King v. King

10 A.D.2d 834, 200 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 A.D.2d 437

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent. No opinion. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. King, 10 A.D.2d 834, 200 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10560 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

10 A.D.2d 834 (King v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.