King v. King
176 A.D. 940
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 176 A.D. 940 (King v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. King, 176 A.D. 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinions
Interlocutory judgment and order affirmed, without costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented in a memorandum; Lambert, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Berndt v. Berndt
130 Misc. 854 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)
Olmsted v. Olmsted
210 A.D. 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
176 A.D. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-king-nyappdiv-1917.