King v. King
176 A.D. 940
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1917·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Interlocutory judgment and order affirmed, without costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented in a memorandum; Lambert, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. King, 176 A.D. 940 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
176 A.D. 940 (King v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Berndt v. Berndt
130 Misc. 854 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)
Olmsted v. Olmsted
210 A.D. 393 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)