King v. . King

121 N.E. 874, 224 N.Y. 669, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1078
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 12, 1918·Published

Opinion

Final judgment affirmed, without costs. Appeal from interlocutory judgment dismissed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and McLaughlin, JJ. Absent: Crane, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. . King, 121 N.E. 874, 224 N.Y. 669, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1078 (N.Y. 1918).

121 N.E. 874 (King v. . King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.