King v. . King

121 N.E. 874, 224 N.Y. 669, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1078
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 12, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.E. 874 (King v. . King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. . King, 121 N.E. 874, 224 N.Y. 669, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1078 (N.Y. 1918).

Opinion

Final judgment affirmed, without costs. Appeal from interlocutory judgment dismissed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and McLaughlin, JJ. Absent: Crane, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
121 N.E. 874, 224 N.Y. 669, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-king-ny-1918.