King v. King

4 A.2d 405, 125 N.J. Eq. 94, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 633
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 6, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 4 A.2d 405 (King v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. King, 4 A.2d 405, 125 N.J. Eq. 94, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 633 (N.J. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree in chancery construing the last will and testament of Bertha B. King, deceased.

Testatrix, in the third paragraph of her will, provided that:

*95 “All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate of whatsoever kind, whether real, personal, or mixed, and wheresoever situate, and whether now owned or hereafter acquired by me, I give, devise, bequeath, limit, and appoint absolutely unto my beloved husband, Albert S. King, and unto the heirs, executors, administrators and assigns forever of my said husband.”

Albert S. King predeceased his wife, Bertha B. King. No children were born of this marriage. The contest is between Laura Y. King, a sister of Bertha B. King, deceased, but who was in nowise related to the husband of Bertha B. King, or his family, and the heirs of the husband of Bertha B. King.

The court below concluded that the words used in the cited paragraph of the will were words of limitation and not of substitution and that upon Albert S. King predeceasing his wife, Bertha B. King, there was a lapse so far as the distribution of the residuary estate of Bertha B. King was concerned and that upon this lapse Bertha B. King died intestate as to that estate and the same descends to Laura Y. King, her only next of kin and heir-at-law.

We have carefully considered the record and briefs submitted and are of the opinion that the conclusions of the learned vice-chancellor are correct.

The decree appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trefohabd, Parker, Case, Bodife, Dofges, Heher, Perskie, Porter, Heteield, Dear, Wells, WolesKeil, Raeeerty, Walker, JJ. 15. •

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawes v. Lynch
72 A.2d 414 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Halsey
40 A.2d 645 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Whitney v. Lott
36 A.2d 888 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Bottomley v. Bottomley
35 A.2d 475 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Camden Trust Co. v. Wolfe
25 A.2d 915 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 A.2d 405, 125 N.J. Eq. 94, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-king-nj-1939.