King v. King

438 N.W.2d 796, 231 Neb. 990, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 178
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedApril 27, 1989
DocketNo. 88-771
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 N.W.2d 796 (King v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. King, 438 N.W.2d 796, 231 Neb. 990, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 178 (Neb. 1989).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Annette C. King, has appealed from the judgment of the district court which ordered a dissolution of the marriage of the parties and awarded custody of their minor child to the respondent, Mark H. King. As the sole assignment of error, petitioner attacks the custody award.

Child custody determinations are matters initially entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court, and, on appeal, that court’s determination will be affirmed in the absence of an abuse of discretion. Hibbard v. Hibbard, 230 Neb. 364, 431 N. W.2d 637 (1988). Having reviewed the record de novo, which we are required to do, we find the action of the trial court in the awarding of custody was fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the child, and was not the result of an abuse of discretion.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ensrud v. Ensrud
451 N.W.2d 270 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 N.W.2d 796, 231 Neb. 990, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-king-neb-1989.