King v. King
This text of 186 So. 2d 775 (King v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Court, after having studied the briefs and proceedings in the above-styled cause, is of the opinion that the motion of the appellant requesting the Court to reinstate appellant’s appeal should be sustained, and the appeal in No. 44,077 should be reinstated. It is ordered therefore that the appeal in this cause be reinstated.
It is the further order of the Court that the motion to consolidate the appeal in cause No. 44,162 and cause No. 44,077 is hereby sustained so that the appeal in the divorce case and the appeal in the contempt case be heard as one cause.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
186 So. 2d 775, 1966 Miss. LEXIS 1333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-king-miss-1966.