King v. King

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. King

750 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1685, 2000 WL 201209

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 2000

DocketNo. 3D98-1539

StatusPublished

This text of 750 So. 2d 779 (King v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. King, 750 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1685, 2000 WL 201209 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion to Enforce Mandate

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion to enforce this Court’s mandate in King v. King, 734 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court is instructed to enter an order directing that the husband’s child support obligation will be $1,297 per month, retroactive to May 5, 1997. Further, pursuant to the reservation of jurisdiction contained in paragraph 7 of the report of General Master dated November 30,1998, the Gen[780]*780eral Master is to recalculate the arrearage amounts.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion to Enforce Mandate

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion to enforce this Court’s mandate in King v. King, 734 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court is instructed to enter an order directing that the husband’s child support obligation will be $1,297 per month, retroactive to May 5, 1997. Further, pursuant to the reservation of jurisdiction contained in paragraph 7 of the report of General Master dated November 30,1998, the Gen[780]*780eral Master is to recalculate the arrearage amounts.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

750 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1685, 2000 WL 201209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-king-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack