King v. King

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. King

750 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1685, 2000 WL 201209

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2000·No. No. 3D98-1539·Published

Opinion

On Motion to Enforce Mandate

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion to enforce this Court’s mandate in King v. King, 734 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court is instructed to enter an order directing that the husband’s child support obligation will be $1,297 per month, retroactive to May 5, 1997. Further, pursuant to the reservation of jurisdiction contained in paragraph 7 of the report of General Master dated November 30,1998, the Gen[780] eral Master is to recalculate the arrearage amounts.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On Motion to Enforce Mandate

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion to enforce this Court’s mandate in King v. King, 734 So.2d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The trial court is instructed to enter an order directing that the husband’s child support obligation will be $1,297 per month, retroactive to May 5, 1997. Further, pursuant to the reservation of jurisdiction contained in paragraph 7 of the report of General Master dated November 30,1998, the Gen[780] eral Master is to recalculate the arrearage amounts.

Motion granted.

King v. King, 750 So. 2d 779, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1685, 2000 WL 201209 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

750 So. 2d 779 (King v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related