King v. King

546 So. 2d 464, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1769, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4205, 1989 WL 81747
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in King v. King. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2031
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 1989·No. No. 89-0521·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have not been provided with a sufficient record to permit us to make a determination whether the conditions precedent to the issuance of a temporary injunction were performed; however, we find the order containing the injunction facially insufficient. We therefore reverse and remand to permit either party, if he or she is so inclined, to apply for an injunction and we direct compliance with rule 1.160, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, and section 741.-30, Florida Statutes (1987), should it be appropriate to grant such application.

HERSEY, C.J., and DOWNEY and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King v. King, 546 So. 2d 464, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1769, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4205, 1989 WL 81747 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

546 So. 2d 464 (King v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.