King v. King
This text of 178 So. 2d 35 (King v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal of an order of the circuit court dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.
Plaintiffs filed their amended complaint in equity against the defendant guardian and her surety seeking, inter alia, imposition of a resulting or constructive trust, an accounting, and injunctive relief. The complaint was bottomed on a wilful misappropriation and conversion of the incompetent’s property. The acts complained of allegedly took place before and during the guardian’s tenure.
It is our view that the amended complaint should not have been dismissed with prejudice. We recognize . the principles announced by this court in McLean v. Little River Bank & Trust Co., Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 835, and in Security Trust Co. v. Cannon, Fla.App.1965, 165 So.2d 834 and are of the opinion that the holding in this case is consistent with both of those decisions.
The Security Trust and McLean cases recognize that the circuit court jurisdiction may be invoked when it is made to appear that an adequate remedy in the probate court is not available. Proceedings by way of devastavit could not remedy all of the wrongs alleged in the amended compaint. Hence, plaintiffs should be allowed to amend their complaint to conform with rules announced in the Security Trust and McLean cases, supra. See also Bambrick v. Bambrick, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 449.
The order of dismissal with prejudice is reversed and the cause remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
178 So. 2d 35, 1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 4050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-king-fladistctapp-1965.