King v. Keefe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

King v. Keefe

268 A.D.2d 308, 700 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 446

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 18, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J.), entered May 1, 1998, which granted the petition for a writ of prohibition precluding respondents from conducting a final parole revocation hearing with respect to petitioner parolee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[309] The court properly granted prohibition since petitioner’s parole was automatically revoked upon his conviction of felonies and sentences to indeterminate terms, thereby precluding the commencement of the final revocation hearing (see, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [d] [iii]; 9 NYCRR 8004.3 [h]; People ex rel. Harris v Sullivan, 74 NY2d 305; Matter of Pierre v Rodriguez, 131 AD2d 763). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J.), entered May 1, 1998, which granted the petition for a writ of prohibition precluding respondents from conducting a final parole revocation hearing with respect to petitioner parolee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[309] The court properly granted prohibition since petitioner’s parole was automatically revoked upon his conviction of felonies and sentences to indeterminate terms, thereby precluding the commencement of the final revocation hearing (see, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [d] [iii]; 9 NYCRR 8004.3 [h]; People ex rel. Harris v Sullivan, 74 NY2d 305; Matter of Pierre v Rodriguez, 131 AD2d 763). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

King v. Keefe, 268 A.D.2d 308, 700 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

268 A.D.2d 308 (King v. Keefe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related