King v. Keefe

268 A.D.2d 308, 700 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 446
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 18, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D.2d 308 (King v. Keefe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Keefe, 268 A.D.2d 308, 700 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 446 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John Byrne, J.), entered May 1, 1998, which granted the petition for a writ of prohibition precluding respondents from conducting a final parole revocation hearing with respect to petitioner parolee, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[309]*309The court properly granted prohibition since petitioner’s parole was automatically revoked upon his conviction of felonies and sentences to indeterminate terms, thereby precluding the commencement of the final revocation hearing (see, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [d] [iii]; 9 NYCRR 8004.3 [h]; People ex rel. Harris v Sullivan, 74 NY2d 305; Matter of Pierre v Rodriguez, 131 AD2d 763). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oriole v. Saunders
66 A.D.2d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D.2d 308, 700 N.Y.S.2d 713, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-keefe-nyappdiv-2000.