King v. Humphreys
22 A. 19, 138 Pa. 310, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1275
Opinion
We find no substantial error in tbis record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. Humphreys, 22 A. 19, 138 Pa. 310, 1890 Pa. LEXIS 1275 (Pa. 1890).
22 A. 19 (King v. Humphreys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hagopian v. Eskandarian
153 A.2d 897 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
Calanno Estate
14 Pa. D. & C.2d 153 (Philadelphia County Orphans' Court, 1958)
Chambley v. Rumbaugh
5 A.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Gallagher v. Rogan
199 A. 168 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
King v. Lemmer
173 A. 176 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1934)
Boyd v. Kilmer
132 A. 709 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1926)
Munson v. Crookston
68 A. 962 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Rudolph v. Rudolph
17 Pa. Super. 558 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
Baldwin v. Stier
43 A. 326 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)
President, Etc., of Bowdoin College v. Merritt
75 F. 480 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1896)
Crothers v. Crothers
24 A. 190 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1892)