King v. Holder
This text of King v. Holder (King v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1583
JOLIFFE LLOYD KING,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: February 19, 2010 Decided: March 3, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rev. Uduak James Ubom, UBOM LAW GROUP, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Theo Nickerson, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Joliffe Lloyd King, a native and citizen of the United
Kingdom, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (Board) finding him removable and ordering
his removal from the United States. We have reviewed the
administrative record and find that substantial evidence
supports the Board’s conclusions. See Rodriguez v. Mukasey, 519
F.3d 773, 777 (8th Cir. 2008). We accordingly deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: King
(B.I.A. Apr. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
King v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-holder-ca4-2010.