King v. Hiles-Carver Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

King v. Hiles-Carver Co.

37 S.E. 178, 112 Ga. 157, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 80

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 31, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 178 (King v. Hiles-Carver Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Hiles-Carver Co., 37 S.E. 178, 112 Ga. 157, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 80 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

A bill of exceptions complaining of the refusal at chambers in vacation to grant a new trial on a motion therefor made in term must be tendered within thirty days after such refusal. Civil Code, § 5539; In re Ross, 95 Ga. 569. The fact that the term at which the case was tried continued for more than thirty days does not in any way affect the time within which exceptions must he taken to the ruling upon the motion for new trial.

Writ of error dismissed.

All concurring, except Little J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

A bill of exceptions complaining of the refusal at chambers in vacation to grant a new trial on a motion therefor made in term must be tendered within thirty days after such refusal. Civil Code, § 5539; In re Ross, 95 Ga. 569. The fact that the term at which the case was tried continued for more than thirty days does not in any way affect the time within which exceptions must he taken to the ruling upon the motion for new trial.

Writ of error dismissed.

All concurring, except Little J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 S.E. 178, 112 Ga. 157, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 80, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-hiles-carver-co-ga-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack