King v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.

88 Ohio St. 3d 539
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 24, 2000
DocketNos. 99-727 and 99-1264
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 88 Ohio St. 3d 539 (King v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co., 88 Ohio St. 3d 539 (Ohio 2000).

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawler v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
322 F.3d 900 (Third Circuit, 2003)
Lawler v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
322 F.3d 900 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
King v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.
2000 Ohio 403 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Ohio St. 3d 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-grange-mutual-casualty-co-ohio-2000.