King v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

King v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.

88 Ohio St. 3d 539

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 2000·No. Nos. 99-727 and 99-1264·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings and consideration, where applicable, of the Supreme Court’s decisions in Wolfe v. Wolfe (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 246, 725 N.E.2d 261, and Moore v. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. (2000), 88 Ohio St.3d 27, 723 N.E.2d 97.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs separately. Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

King v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co., 88 Ohio St. 3d 539 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

88 Ohio St. 3d 539 (King v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related