King v. Gosdin
This text of 315 S.E.2d 666 (King v. Gosdin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee Gosdin filed suit against appellant King to recover for injuries allegedly incurred in an automobile collision. King, in turn, filed a third-party action against Derryl Langley. This appeal by King follows the trial court’s order dismissing the third-party complaint based on his failure to respond to a motion by Langley to dismiss the third-party complaint for lack of venue. Held:
1. Since the order disposes of less than all the claims and does not provide for the entry of a final judgment as to the third-party defendant pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-54 (b) (Code Ann. § 81A-154), and since the procedures for interlocutory appeal have not been followed, the appeal must be dismissed. See D. Davis & Co. v. Plunkett, 119 Ga. App. 453 (167 SE2d 663) (1969); Martin v. Herr, 158 Ga. App. 329 (280 SE2d 387) (1981).
2. The appellee’s prayer for damages for filing a frivolous appeal is denied. See James v. Seritt, 121 Ga. App. 783 (175 SE2d 163) [879]*879(1970).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
315 S.E.2d 666, 169 Ga. App. 878, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-gosdin-gactapp-1984.