King v. Gil
This text of 69 A.D.3d 678 (King v. Gil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the Supreme Court’s determination that the testimony of the process server was more credible than that of the defense witnesses is entitled to great deference on appeal, and its conclusion that service was properly effected upon the defendants is supported by the record (see Aguilera v Pistilli Constr. & Dev. Corp., 63 AD3d 765, 767 [2009]; Mastroianni v Rallye Glen Cove, LLC, 59 AD3d 686, 687 [2009]; Gass v Gass, 42 AD3d 393 [2007]; Ahrens v Chisena, 40 AD3d 787, 788 [2007]; Lattingtown Harbor Prop. Owners Assn., Inc. v Agostino, 34 AD3d 536, 538 [2006]). Accordingly, we discern no basis in the record to disturb the Supreme Court’s resolution of the issues.
The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.R, Fisher, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 A.D.3d 678, 891 N.Y.2d 655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-gil-nyappdiv-2010.