King v. Garnes
This text of 305 N.E.2d 798 (King v. Garnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellees contend that the filing was not timely because it was not filed within ten days after the administrator’s decision on reconsideration was mailed to appellant. However, an examination of the record discloses no evidence to show when the decision was, in fact, mailed, nor did the employer attempt to assert a date of mailing before the Board of Review.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 N.E.2d 798, 36 Ohio St. 2d 187, 65 Ohio Op. 2d 404, 1973 Ohio LEXIS 304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-garnes-ohio-1973.