King v. Forman
This text of 28 S.E.2d 927 (King v. Forman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit in which the plaintiff recovered, brought in the municipal court of Savannah by a prospective purchaser of real estate against the president of an alleged insolvent sales corporation, which acted as sales broker on behalf of the owner, to recover as for “money had received” the earnest payment on the purchase-price in accordance with the offer made by the plaintiff. The defendant had deposited this payment to the account of the sales corporation, knowing it to be insolvent, and had failed and refused to return this sum upon failure of the sale to go through on account of a refusal of the plaintiff’s offer. Seld:
Irrespective of whether or not the plaintiff could have maintained an equitable proceeding seeking, as he did, merely to recover a money judgment for the payment made (see in this connection, Alexander v. Coyne, 143 Ga. 696, 698, 85 S. E. 831, L. R. A. 1916D, 1039; Regal Textile Co. v. Feil, 189 Ga. 581, 584, 6 S. E. 2d, 908), since the action for a money judgment was brought in a court having no equitable jurisdiction, and no equitable relief was sought, the suit will be construed as one at law, and as such, the refusal of a new trial will not support a bill of exceptions to this court. See McDowell v. McDowell, 194 Ga. *265 88, 91 (20 S. E. 2d, 602) ; Stoddard v. Campbell, 27 Ga. App. 363 (3) (108 S. E. 311). Accordingly, the writ of'error must be Transferred to Court of Appeals.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.E.2d 927, 197 Ga. 264, 1944 Ga. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-forman-ga-1944.