King v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

923 So. 2d 557, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3744, 2006 WL 658665

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 17, 2006

DocketNo. 1D04-3931

StatusPublished

This text of 923 So. 2d 557 (King v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 923 So. 2d 557, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3744, 2006 WL 658665 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, J.

Morris King, Jr. appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission determining that he was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits. The order denying appellant benefits for the period at issue in the instant case was affirmed by this court in King v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 892 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (table case); therefore, the benefits paid during the disqualified period are an overpayment which appellant must repay. See generally Unemployment Appeals Comm’n v. Comer, 504 So.2d 760 (Fla.1987).

We conclude that the Commission’s ruling on the overpayment issue is correct and in accordance with the requirements of section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2004). Finding no reversible error in the order on appeal, the order is affirmed.

ERVIN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, J.

Morris King, Jr. appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission determining that he was overpaid unemployment compensation benefits. The order denying appellant benefits for the period at issue in the instant case was affirmed by this court in King v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 892 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (table case); therefore, the benefits paid during the disqualified period are an overpayment which appellant must repay. See generally Unemployment Appeals Comm’n v. Comer, 504 So.2d 760 (Fla.1987).

We conclude that the Commission’s ruling on the overpayment issue is correct and in accordance with the requirements of section 443.151(6)(b), Florida Statutes (2004). Finding no reversible error in the order on appeal, the order is affirmed.

ERVIN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

923 So. 2d 557, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3744, 2006 WL 658665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack